Relationships anywhere between sexting habits and you can relevant services
Data was indeed analysed having fun with SPSS twenty-five.0. Very first descriptive analyses was performed, in addition to Cronbach’s alphas and you will wavelengths. Binary logistic regressions were utilized to assess connections anywhere between sex, years, sexual direction, having an intimate/sexual spouse, SNS used, sexting normalisation and you may desire to take part in sexting as separate details, and the five sexting habits just like the created variables. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen 2 are regarded as a measure of impression dimensions. Most of the details was indeed registered towards the design at exactly the same time. The analysis has also been stratified because of the gender.
Prevalence away from sexting behaviours
The most este artГculo widespread sexting behaviors are receiving (21.2%) and having via a mediator (twenty eight.4%), with 3rd-cluster forwarding away from sexual content (nine.3%) and you will, lastly, sending (8.1%). Detailed statistics are given in Table 2.
The latest regression patterns had been tall. Nagelkerke’s R dos are .42 into the “sending” design, .29 into the “receiving” design, .23 to the “third-group forwarding” model, and .17 on the “finding thru an intermediary” model (Desk 3:
On the “sending” model, desire to help you sext (OR: 8.26; 95% confidence period [CI]: 5.36-), with a romantic/sexual mate (OR: 3.44; 95% CI: dos.25-5.25), having fun with Snapchat (OR: step 1.87; 95% CI: step 1.19-dos.93), intimate positioning (OR: step one.77; 95% CI: 1.04-step three.00) and you can ages (OR: step one.36; 95% CI: step 1.14-1.63) was significantly pertaining to giving wedding. On the “receiving” model, that have a romantic/sexual companion (OR: step 3.27; 95% CI: 2.51-cuatro.28), determination so you can sext (OR: dos.79; 95% CI: 2.01-3.89), using Instagram (OR: step 1.89; 95% CI: step 1.16-step 3.10), intercourse (OR: step one.82; 95% CI: 1.37-dos.41), playing with Snapchat (OR: 1.61; 95% CI: step 1.dos1-dos.14), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.49; 95% CI: step 1.20-1.86) and years (OR: step 1.26; 95% CI: step 1.step 12-1.41) had been somewhat linked to searching wedding.
From the “third-group forwarding” design, playing with Instagram (OR: dos.74; 95% CI: step 1.16-6.51), determination to help you sext (OR: dos.00; 95% CI: step 1.48-dos.72), sex (OR: 1.96; 95% CI: step one.3dos-dos.91), having an intimate/intimate lover (OR: step 1.86; 95% CI: step 1.dos9-2.68), having fun with Fb (OR: step 1.53; 95% CI: step 1.03-dos.26), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.43; 95% CI: step one.09-1.87) and you may age (OR: step 1.43; 95% CI: 1.22-1.66) had been significantly related to involvement inside the third-cluster forwarding.
Throughout the “researching via an intermediary” design, playing with Instagram (OR: 2.step one6; 95% CI: step 1.47-step three.19), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.84; 95% CI: step one.52-dos.24), with an intimate/sexual lover (OR: step one.71; 95% CI: step one.35-dos.17), gender (OR: step 1.4step one; 95% CI: step one.step 11-step one.80) and you will ages (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: step 1.23-step one.49) had been significantly connected with wedding within the searching thru an intermediary.
Intercourse differences
The new regression habits was in fact significant. Nagelkerke’s R 2 is .fifty for women and .41 for guys to your “sending” model; .30 for girls and you will .31 having people into “receiving” model; .18 for women and .twenty four to own guys on “third-class forwarding” model; and you will .fourteen for females and you can .twenty two to own males towards the “researching thru a mediator” model (Dining table cuatro:
In the “sending” model, for females, willingness to help you sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), which have an intimate/intimate mate (OR: cuatro.54; 95% CI: 2.27-9.09) and you can decades (OR: step 1.60; 95% CI: step one.17-dos.20) had been notably pertaining to delivering wedding. To possess boys, they were willingness so you can sext (OR: 6.05; 95% CI: step 3.68-nine.94), that have an intimate/intimate spouse (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: 1.59-4.88) and ultizing Snapchat (OR: 2.38; 95% CI: step one.32-cuatro.29).
Throughout the “receiving” design, for girls, willingness so you’re able to sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: dos.57-), using Instagram (OR: 4.34; 95% CI: step 1.43-), with an enchanting/intimate partner (OR: 3.77; 95% CI: dos.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.62; 95% CI: step one.13-dos.33) and you will decades (OR: step one.42; 95% CI: step one.step 17-step 1.72) was basically notably pertaining to searching involvement. Getting people, they were that have an intimate/intimate mate (OR: dos.97; 95% CI: 2.08-cuatro.25), readiness to sext (OR: dos.32; 95% CI: step 1.58-step 3.41), playing with Snapchat (OR: 2.03; 95% CI: step one.38-dos.91), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.40; 95% CI: 1.06-step 1.86) and you will decades (OR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.04-step one.38).